z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Battle of the giants: Plants versus animals in idealised landscapes of ‘deep time’
Author(s) -
Vujaković Peter
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
plants, people, planet
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2572-2611
DOI - 10.1002/ppp3.10058
Subject(s) - parade , context (archaeology) , environmental ethics , battle , deep time , plant life , narrative , ecology , geography , history , biology , archaeology , paleontology , art , literature , philosophy , forestry
Societal Impact Statement Understanding our place in the universe is important. If we are to make sense of our place, we have to examine this not only within the context of ‘deep time’, the geological history of our planet, but also within the role of other key organisms, specifically plants. Scientists present this history to the public, but we must be aware of the biases that can often be part of these representations, no matter how well intentioned or seemingly objective. Too often images are focused on animals, especially higher animals, and ignore other vital parts of our ecosystems. This has consequences for understanding Earth's history, and also how we treat organisms today. Summary ‘Plant blindness’ is a feature of our modern world, and of popular science narratives of the evolution of life. Plants are often overlooked and certainly poorly represented in the visual representations of past life on Earth (deep time). They tend to form the backdrop to the teeming activity of evolving animal life and are only mentioned (with appropriate images) at a few significant waypoints: the movement of life to land, the great coal‐forming forests of the Carboniferous period and the evolution of the flowering plants. While plant life is essential for animal life to thrive on land, chapter titles such as ‘The invasion of land’ and discussion thereof are still generally reserved for animals, and even then, the vertebrates. This paper explores the genesis of this approach to representing deep time as essentially a parade of animal life and shows that during the early period of popular scientific representation, plants were given their due place in some key publications by, for example, Franz Unger and Josef Kuwasseg in the 19th century and Zdenek Burian in the 20th century. Part of the problem appears to be the seemingly static nature of plants and the apparent demand for activity (often predation) that has its origins in science as spectacle, beginning with Henry de la Beche.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here