Premium
Surface Modification of Poly(propylene) Microporous Membrane to Improve Its Antifouling Characteristics in an SMBR: O 2 Plasma Treatment
Author(s) -
Yu HaiYin,
He XiaoChun,
Liu LanQin,
Gu JiaShan,
Wei XianWen
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
plasma processes and polymers
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.644
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1612-8869
pISSN - 1612-8850
DOI - 10.1002/ppap.200700051
Subject(s) - contact angle , membrane , fouling , wetting , biofouling , microporous material , materials science , chemical engineering , surface modification , membrane fouling , filtration (mathematics) , ultimate tensile strength , water treatment , chemistry , chromatography , composite material , environmental engineering , biochemistry , statistics , mathematics , engineering
Fouling is the major obstacle in membrane processes applied in water and wastewater treatment. To improve the antifouling characteristics of PPHFMMs in an SMBR for wastewater treatment, the PPHFMMs were surface‐modified by O 2 low temperature plasma treatment. Structural and morphological changes on the membrane surface were characterized by XPS and FE‐SEM. The change of surface wettability was monitored by contact angle measurements. Results of XPS clearly indicated that the plasma treatment introduced oxygen containing polar groups on the membrane surface. The static water contact angle of the modified membrane reduced obviously with the increase of plasma treatment time. The relative pure water flux for the modified membranes increased with plasma treatment time up to 1 min, then it decreased with further increase of plasma treatment time. Decreases in the tensile strength and the tensile elongation at break of the modified membranes were also observed. To assess the relation between the plasma treatment and the membrane fouling in an SMBR, filtration for activated sludge was carried out by using synthetic wastewater. After continuous operation in the SMBR for about 75 h, flux recovery were 8.7 and 12.3%, reduction of flux were 91.6 and 87.4% for the nascent and O 2 plasma treated PPHFMM for 1 min, relative flux ratio for O 2 plasma treated PPHFMM for 1 min was 49.9% higher than that of the nascent PPHFMM.