Premium
Revisiting the Reproductive Concerns After Cancer (RCAC) scale
Author(s) -
Gorman Jessica R.,
PanWeisz Tonya M.,
Drizin Julia H.,
Su H. Irene,
Malcarne Vanessa L.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
psycho‐oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.41
H-Index - 137
eISSN - 1099-1611
pISSN - 1057-9249
DOI - 10.1002/pon.5130
Subject(s) - scale (ratio) , confirmatory factor analysis , reliability (semiconductor) , demography , clinical psychology , psychology , medicine , gerontology , structural equation modeling , statistics , mathematics , geography , cartography , power (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics , sociology
Objective The aims of this study were to examine the factor structure and reliability of the multidimensional Reproductive Concerns After Cancer (RCAC) scale in a sample of female cancer survivors during their reproductive years, younger than age 45. Methods Female reproductive‐aged survivors (N = 238; current age, 18 to 44 y) with a variety of cancer diagnoses completed a web‐based survey that included the RCAC scale. Three structural models were examined via confirmatory factor analysis: (a) one‐factor, (b) higher‐order with one second‐order factor and six first‐order factors, and (c) oblique six‐factor. Reliability was examined using omega total and Revelle omega total. Results Only the oblique six‐factor model of the RCAC scale fits well. Omega total and Revelle omega total estimates for all of the six three‐item subscales were in the nearly satisfactory to good range (.66 to.87). Conclusions The RCAC scale was found to have satisfactory factor structure and reliability when measuring a range of reproductive concerns experienced by female reproductive‐aged survivors. The RCAC scale is a multidimensional measure of varying aspects of reproductive concerns, and results suggest that the scale may be best represented as a profile of subscale scores. The subscale scores would be useful for tailoring recommendations and interventions to more effectively address the diverse reproductive concerns of female reproductive‐aged survivors.