Premium
Thyroid cancer patients receiving an interdisciplinary team‐based care approach ( ITCA‐ThyCa ) appear to display better outcomes: P rogram evaluation results indicating a need for further integrated care and support
Author(s) -
Henry Melissa,
Frenkiel Saul,
Chartier Gabrielle,
MacDonald Christina,
Payne Richard J.,
Black Martin J.,
Mlynarek Alex M.,
Zeitouni Anthony,
Kost Karen,
Loiselle Carmen,
Ehrler Antoinette,
Rosberger Zeev,
Tamilia Michael,
Chang Yu Xin,
Mora Cecilia,
Arbaud Camille,
Hier Michael P.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
psycho‐oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.41
H-Index - 137
eISSN - 1099-1611
pISSN - 1057-9249
DOI - 10.1002/pon.4590
Subject(s) - medicine , thyroid cancer , cancer , intervention (counseling) , health care , family medicine , nursing , economics , economic growth
Background Thyroid cancer (ThyCa) is generally associated with a favorable prognosis and excellent surgical outcomes. Consequently, its treatment is medically focused and current guidelines recommend interdisciplinary care including access to a nurse for complex cases alone. To date, no studies have evaluated the need for and impact of an Interdisciplinary Team‐based Care Approach (ITCA‐ThyCa) for general thyroid cancer patients, including a dedicated nurse as part of a larger interdisciplinary team, as well as patient‐reported outcomes, as is recommended worldwide in cancer care. Our aim was to evaluate such a program. Methods The ITCA‐ThyCa was evaluated within a quasi‐experimental design using the Centers for Disease Control Framework for Program Evaluation, including process and outcome measures. Patients eligible were adults with a biopsy indicating confirmed or highly suspicious ThyCa (TNM‐Classification + Bethesda score of V /VI). The intervention group (IG) received ITCA‐ThyCa and the comparison group (CG), usual care alone. Results In our sample comprised of 200 participants (122 IG; 78 CG), ITCA‐ThyCa patients appeared to show significantly better outcomes than CG patients, namely, higher levels of overall well‐being ( P = .001) and fewer physical ( P = .003) and practical ( P = .003) issues and concerns. More satisfied with their overall care ( P = .028), including care coordination ( P = .049), they reported their health care provider as more approachable ( P = .007), respectful ( P = .005), and trustworthy ( P = .077; trend) and were more likely to recommend their hospital ( P = .02). Ninety‐eight percent of IG patients recommended ITCA‐ThyCa. Conclusion Data from our program illustrates that hospital resources should not be allocated based on medical trajectory alone and challenges the idea that ThyCa is “straightforward.” ThyCa patients seem to experience symptom distress at a level comparable to—or exceeding—that of general oncological patients despite their promising medical outcomes, indicating that better integrated care and support are in order.