Premium
Sexual functioning in breast cancer survivors experiencing body image disturbance
Author(s) -
Boquiren Virginia M.,
Esplen Mary Jane,
Wong Jiahui,
Toner Brenda,
Warner Ellen,
Malik Noorulain
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
psycho‐oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.41
H-Index - 137
eISSN - 1099-1611
pISSN - 1057-9249
DOI - 10.1002/pon.3819
Subject(s) - breast cancer , psychosocial , biopsychosocial model , clinical psychology , quality of life (healthcare) , medicine , sexual function , cancer , psychology , gynecology , psychiatry , psychotherapist
Background Breast cancer treatments and the traumatic nature of the cancer experience frequently elicit considerable sexual difficulties. Breast cancer survivors (BCS) experiencing body image (BI) issues may represent a vulnerable group for developing sexual dysfunction posttreatment. The current study explores sexual functioning (SF) in this unique clinical group. Methods A descriptive study assessed 127 BCS who were engaged in sexual activity. Standardized baseline measures included the following: BI Scale, BI after Breast Cancer Questionnaire, Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Breast. Levels of SF were compared with BCS, heterogeneous cancer, and healthy female populations. Correlational analyses were conducted between SF, BI, relationship, and health‐related quality of life variables. Guided by a conceptual framework, regression analyses were conducted to determine significant demographic, clinical, and psychosocial predictors of sexual desire, satisfaction, and overall SF. Results Eighty‐three per cent of BCS met the FSFI clinical cutoff score for a sexual dysfunction. Participants exhibited poorer SF when compared with other female cancer and healthy groups. No significant correlations were found between BI questionnaire total scores and SF. BI after Breast Cancer Questionnaire – Body Stigma subscale showed significant associations with FSFI Arousal, Orgasm, Satisfaction (average r = −0.23), and overall SF ( r = −0.25). Vaginal dryness ( β = −0.50), body stigma ( β = −0.24), and relationship satisfaction ( β = 0.27) were significant predictors of overall SF. Conclusion Difficulties in SF appear to be highly prevalent in BCS experiencing BI disturbance posttreatment. Brief screening tools assessing SF should adopt a biopsychosocial model, which includes questions regarding vaginal dryness, relationship satisfaction, and body stigma issues. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.