Premium
Patient cues and symptoms of psychosocial distress: what predicts assessment and treatment of distress by oncology clinicians?
Author(s) -
Sheldon Lisa Kennedy,
Blonquist Traci M.,
Hilaire Dany M.,
Hong Fangxin,
Berry Donna L.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
psycho‐oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.41
H-Index - 137
eISSN - 1099-1611
pISSN - 1057-9249
DOI - 10.1002/pon.3689
Subject(s) - psychosocial , distress , referral , medicine , quality of life (healthcare) , clinical psychology , psychiatry , family medicine , nursing
Objective Psychosocial concerns arise after a cancer diagnosis and during treatment requiring oncology clinicians to initiate discussions to identify distress. This study examined patient–clinician communication about psychosocial concerns and predictors of assessment and treatment/referral for distress. Methods Secondary analysis of existing dataset coded to explore patient–clinician communication during ambulatory visits in two comprehensive cancer centers was carried out. Sample included adult patients with various cancers and stages. Dataset included audio‐recordings and symptom/QOL reports 4–6 weeks after starting treatment from all distressed patients ( n = 66) in parent study and random sample of nondistressed patients ( n = 23). Distressed patients had moderate‐to‐severe depression (Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 scores ≥10) and/or poor emotional functioning (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire emotional function scores <50). Audio‐recordings were coded to describe patient–clinician communication about psychosocial concerns using the coding scheme from the parent study plus Medical Interview Aural Rating System. Results The remaining patients gave 222 cues of psychosocial concerns: 183 from 46 distressed patients and 39 from nine nondistressed patients. Distressed patients were younger, were female, had higher symptom burden, and/or gave more cues. Significantly, more distressed patients had at least one cue/visit. Clinicians initiated 62% of discussions overall with no statistical difference between distressed and nondistressed groups. More explicit cues and more than four cues predicted treatment/referral for distress. Conclusions Distressed patients were younger, were female, had higher symptom burden, and/or gave more verbal cues. Clinicians responded to explicit and more frequent cues by providing treatment and/or referrals for distress. Further exploration is needed regarding clinician factors related to assessment of psychosocial concerns. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.