z-logo
Premium
Which factors predict proposal and uptake of psychological counselling after BRCA1/2 test result disclosure?
Author(s) -
Maheu Christine,
Bouhnik AnneDeborah,
Nogues Catherine,
MouretFourme Emmanuelle,
StoppaLyonnet Dominique,
Lasset Christine,
Berthet Pascaline,
Fricker JeanPierre,
Caron Olivier,
Luporsi Elizabeth,
Gladieff Laurence,
JulianReynier Claire
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
psycho‐oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.41
H-Index - 137
eISSN - 1099-1611
pISSN - 1057-9249
DOI - 10.1002/pon.3435
Subject(s) - logistic regression , confidence interval , genetic counseling , odds ratio , medicine , test (biology) , genetic testing , distress , demography , prospective cohort study , psychological distress , cohort , clinical psychology , multivariate analysis , psychology , family medicine , psychiatry , mental health , genetics , biology , paleontology , sociology
Objective The aim of this study is to prospectively determine the factors contributing to whether unaffected women from BRCA1/2 families reported that clinicians proposed psychological consultations and that they had attended these consultations during the genetic testing process. Methods A prospective study was performed on a national cohort, using self‐administered questionnaires to determine the rates of proposal and use of psychological services at the time of BRCA1/2 test result disclosure ( N  = 533) and during the first year after disclosure ( N  = 478) among unaffected French women from BRCA1/2 families who had undergone genetic testing for BRCA1/2. Multivariate adjustment was carried out using logistic regression models fitted using generalized estimation equations, with the genetic testing centre as the clustering variable. Results At the time of BRCA1/2 test result disclosure, a psychological consultation was proposed by cancer geneticists to 72% and 32% of the carriers ( N  = 232) and noncarriers ( N  = 301), respectively ( p  < 0.001). One year after disclosure, 21% of the carriers had consulted a psychologist, versus 9% of the noncarriers ( p  < 0.001). Both the proposal and the uptake depended on the women's BRCA1/2 mutation carrier status (proposal adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 4.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.4–7.2; uptake AOR: 2.2; 95% CI 1.2–4.0), their level of education (proposal AOR: 1.7; 95% CI 1.1–2.7; uptake AOR: 4.5; 95% CI 1.7–12.1) and the distress they experienced about their genetic test results (proposal AOR: 1.02; 95% CI 1.01–1.03; uptake AOR: 1.04; 95% CI 1.02–1.06) Conclusions Determinants of the proposal/uptake of psychological consultations in the BRCA1/2 testing process highlight the need for inventive strategies to reach the different types of women's profiles. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom