z-logo
Premium
Understanding normality: a qualitative analysis of breast cancer patients concepts of normality after mastectomy and reconstructive surgery
Author(s) -
Denford Sarah,
Harcourt D.,
Rubin L.,
Pusic A.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
psycho‐oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.41
H-Index - 137
eISSN - 1099-1611
pISSN - 1057-9249
DOI - 10.1002/pon.1762
Subject(s) - normality , breast cancer , mastectomy , reconstructive surgery , thematic analysis , medicine , breast reconstruction , health care , general surgery , cancer , psychology , family medicine , surgery , qualitative research , psychiatry , sociology , social science , economics , economic growth
Background : As survival rates increase, many people have to adjust to life after cancer. This includes adjusting to life after surgery. While previous research suggests that patients commonly strive to be ‘normal’ after mastectomy and reconstructive surgery, research surrounding individual perceptions of normality is lacking. Aim : The aim of this study was to explore concepts of normality within a sample of breast cancer patients eligible for reconstructive surgery following mastectomy. Methods : A total of 35 semi structured interviews, with women who had undergone or were about to undergo breast reconstructive surgery following breast cancer, were analysed using thematic analysis. Results : Four main themes emerged from the data. Women referred to looking normal (appearance); being able to fulfil everyday activities (behaviour); adapting to a new normal (reconstructing normality); and not being ill (health). The importance placed on each area of normality differed between patients. Additionally, patients used different standards to anchor concepts of normality. These included individual standards, social standards and clinical standards. Discussion : The results indicate that although there are commonalities between patients' concepts of normality, it is important for health care professionals to recognise potential individual differences. This may usefully aid communication and help to manage expectations among patients considering surgical options. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here