z-logo
Premium
Quality of life of patients with gastric cancer in Taiwan: validation and clinical application of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ‐C30 and EORTC QLQ‐STO22
Author(s) -
Huang ChiCheng,
Lien HengHui,
Sung YungChuan,
Liu HanTing,
Chie WeiChu
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
psycho‐oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.41
H-Index - 137
eISSN - 1099-1611
pISSN - 1057-9249
DOI - 10.1002/pon.1158
Subject(s) - cronbach's alpha , quality of life (healthcare) , medicine , dysphagia , reliability (semiconductor) , discriminant validity , cancer , performance status , physical therapy , psychology , gerontology , psychometrics , clinical psychology , surgery , internal consistency , power (physics) , physics , nursing , quantum mechanics
The relatively high incidence of gastric cancer in Taiwan warranted the need of a disease‐specific quality of life (QOL) instrument. We translated the EORTC QLQ‐C30 and QLQ‐STO22 according to the guidelines from the EORTC. A total of 100 patients were interviewed. Convergent and discriminant validity, Cronbach's alpha coefficient and known‐groups comparisons were used to examine the reliability and validity. We found good reliability for multi‐item subscales of the QLQ‐C30 and QLQ‐STO22 (Cronbach's alpha coefficient: 0.70–0.94) except cognitive functioning of the QLQ‐C30 and eating restriction of the QLQ‐STO22. Patients in the active treatment group experienced compromised functional status and worse treatment‐associated symptoms than those in the follow‐up group. Similar results were found in comparisons based on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status and dysphagia grades. The study has ascertained the cross‐cultural validity, reliability and clinical applicability of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ‐C30 and QLQ‐STO22. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here