z-logo
Premium
Addressing the challenges of modeling the scattering from bottlebrush polymers in solution
Author(s) -
Sunday Daniel F.,
Martin Tyler B.,
Chang Alice B.,
Burns Adam B.,
Grubbs Robert H.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of polymer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2642-4169
pISSN - 2642-4150
DOI - 10.1002/pol.20190289
Subject(s) - scattering , statistical physics , parameter space , maxima and minima , markov chain , markov chain monte carlo , monte carlo method , polymer , physics , biological system , materials science , mathematics , optics , mathematical analysis , statistics , nuclear magnetic resonance , biology
Abstract Small‐angle scattering measurements of complex macromolecules in solution are used to establish relationships between chemical structure and conformational properties. Interpretation of the scattering data requires an inverse approach where a model is chosen and the simulated scattering intensity from that model is iterated to match the experimental scattering intensity. This raises challenges in the case where the model is an imperfect approximation of the underlying structure, or where there are significant correlations between model parameters. We examine three bottlebrush polymers (consisting of polynorbornene backbone and polystyrene side chains) in a good solvent using a model commonly applied to this class of polymers: the flexible cylinder model. Applying a series of constrained Monte‐Carlo Markov Chain analyses demonstrates the severity of the correlations between key parameters and the presence of multiple close minima in the goodness of fit space. We demonstrate that a shape‐agnostic model can fit the scattering with significantly reduced parameter correlations and less potential for complex, multimodal parameter spaces. We provide recommendations to improve the analysis of complex macromolecules in solution, highlighting the value of Bayesian methods. This approach provides richer information for understanding parameter sensitivity compared to methods which produce a single, best fit.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here