z-logo
Premium
Hydrogen bonding. 38. Effect of solute structure and mobile phase composition on reversed‐phase high‐performance liquid chromatographic capacity factors
Author(s) -
Abraham Michael H.,
Rosés Martía
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
journal of physical organic chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.325
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1099-1395
pISSN - 0894-3230
DOI - 10.1002/poc.610071205
Subject(s) - chemistry , taft equation , polarizability , hydrogen bond , phase (matter) , partition coefficient , capacity factor , acetonitrile , octanol , tetrahydrofuran , chromatography , molar refractivity , intermolecular force , thermodynamics , organic chemistry , quantitative structure–activity relationship , molecule , stereochemistry , physics , solvent , substituent
Reversed‐phase HPLC capacity factors, as log k ′, have been correlated through the LFER equation:\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$${\rm log k}^\prime = {\rm c} + {\rm rR}_2 + {\rm s\pi }_2^{\rm H} + {\rm a}\sum {\rm \beta }_2^0 + {\rm vV}_{\rm X}$$\end{document} where k ′ is the capacity factor for a series of solutes in a given stationary phase–mobile phase system, and the explanatory variables are the solute descriptors: R 2 an excess molar refraction, π   2 Hthe dipolarity/polarizability, Σα   2 Hthe overall hydrogen‐bond acidity, Σβ   2 0the overall hydrogen‐bond basicity and V x the McGowan volume. This equation was applied to various C 18 stationary phases with methanol–water, acetonitrile–water and tetrahydrofuran–water buffered mobile phases. The solute and mobile phase factors that influence log k ′ values are set out, and a comparison is made between log k ′ values and water–octanol partition coefficients.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom