z-logo
Premium
Similarity in physical organic chemistry: Substituent effects on the intrinsic basicity of 4‐substituted pyrazoles
Author(s) -
Notario R.,
Herreros M.,
Hammadi A. El,
Homan H.,
Abboud J.L. M.,
Forfar I.,
Claramunt R. M.,
Elguero J.
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
journal of physical organic chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.325
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1099-1395
pISSN - 0894-3230
DOI - 10.1002/poc.610071203
Subject(s) - chemistry , substituent , heteroatom , proton affinity , ring (chemistry) , affinities , computational chemistry , gas phase , ion cyclotron resonance , pyrazole , proton , stereochemistry , ion , protonation , organic chemistry , cyclotron , physics , quantum mechanics
The gas‐phase basicities of eight pyrazoles substituted only at position 4 (R 4 = H, NO 2 , F, Cl, CO 2 C 2 H 5 , CH 3 , NH 2 , 1‐adamantyl) were measured by Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance. The experimental values were treated in two ways, first by comparing these values with the AM1‐calculated proton affinities. Since the correlation was reasonably good [ PA (calc.) = −11·3 + 1·063 PA (exp.), n = 8, r = 0·984], a set of 17 further 4‐substituted pyrazoles and their cations were calculated using the AM1 approximation and their gas‐phase basicities were estimated. Second, both the experimental and the AM1‐calculated values were considered within the framework of the Taft–Topsom analysis of substituent effects. Comparison of the analyses for pyrazoles and pyridines led to the unexpected result that, in spite of differences in ring size and number of heteroatoms, both systems behave remarkably alike.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here