z-logo
Premium
Maximally inhibited elimination of kinetics of (2‐bromoethyl)benzene and 1‐bromo‐3‐phenylpropane in the gas phase. Anchimeric assistance of the phenyl group
Author(s) -
Chuchani Gabriel,
Martin Ignacio
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
journal of physical organic chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.325
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1099-1395
pISSN - 0894-3230
DOI - 10.1002/poc.610030203
Subject(s) - chemistry , arrhenius equation , benzene , cyclohexene , kinetics , torr , medicinal chemistry , reaction rate constant , propene , atmospheric temperature range , stereochemistry , photochemistry , thermodynamics , activation energy , organic chemistry , catalysis , physics , quantum mechanics
The gas‐phase elimination kinetics of (2‐bromoethyl)benzene and 1‐bromo‐3‐phenylpropane were studied in a static system and seasoned vessels over the temperature range 390–450 °C and the pressure range 32–104 Torr. The reactions, under maximum inhibition of 4‐fold pressure of the free‐radical suppressor cyclohexene and/or propene, are homogeneous, unimolecular and obey a first‐order rate law. The rate coefficients are given by the following Arrhenius equations: for (2‐bromoethyl)benzene, log k 1 (s −1 ) = (13·04 ± 0·10) − (210·8 ± 1·3) kJ mol −1 (2·303 RT ) −1 , and for 1‐bromo‐3‐phenylpropane, log k 1 (s −1 ) = (14·09 ± 0·27) − (227·7 ± 3·6) kJ mol −1 (2·303 RT ) −1 . The phenyl group of (2‐bromoethyl)benzene appears to provide anchimeric assistance in the HBr elimination of this compound. However, neighbouring C 6 H 5 participation at the 3‐position in 1‐bromo‐3‐phenylpropane for a C‐4 conformation is apparently absent. The mechanisms of these reactions are discussed.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom