Premium
A theoretical assignment on excited‐state intramolecular proton transfer mechanism for quercetin
Author(s) -
Yang Dapeng,
Yang Guang,
Zhao Jinfeng,
Zheng Rui,
Wang Yusheng,
Lv Jian
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of physical organic chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.325
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1099-1395
pISSN - 0894-3230
DOI - 10.1002/poc.3684
Subject(s) - chemistry , intramolecular force , excited state , density functional theory , hydrogen bond , molecular orbital , computational chemistry , proton , chromophore , molecule , potential energy , photochemistry , atomic physics , stereochemistry , quantum mechanics , organic chemistry , physics
In the present work, we investigate a new chromophore (ie, quercetin) (Simkovitch et al J Phys Chem B 119 [2015] 10244) about its complex excited‐state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) process based on density functional theory and time‐dependent density functional theory methods. On the basis of the calculation of electron density ρ ( r ) and Laplacian ∇ 2 ρ ( r ) at the bond critical point using atoms‐in‐molecule theory, the intramolecular hydrogen bonds (O 1 ‐H 2 ⋯O 5 and O 3 ‐H 4 ⋯O 5 ) have been supported to be formed in the S 0 state. Comparing the prime structural variations of quercetin involved in its 2 intramolecular hydrogen bonds, we find that these 2 hydrogen bonds should be strengthened in the S 1 state, which is a fundamental precondition for facilitating the ESIPT process. Concomitantly, infrared vibrational spectra analysis further verifies this viewpoint. In good agreement with previous experimental spectra results, we find that quercetin reveals 2 kinds of excited‐state structures (quercetin* and quercetin‐PT1*) in the S 1 state. Frontier molecular orbitals depict the nature of electronically excited state and support the ESIPT reaction. Our scanned potential energy curves according to variational O 1 ‐H 2 and O 3 ‐H 4 coordinates demonstrate that the proton transfer process should be more likely to occur in the S 1 state via hydrogen bond wire O 1 ‐H 2 ⋯O 5 rather than O 3 ‐H 4 ⋯O 5 because of the lower potential energy barrier 2.3 kcal/mol. Our present work explains previous experimental result and makes up the deficiency of mechanism in previous experiment. In the end, we make a reasonable assignment for ESIPT process of quercetin.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom