z-logo
Premium
Electron‐counting rules, three‐dimensional aromaticity, and the boundaries of the Periodic Table
Author(s) -
Shainyan Bagrat A.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of physical organic chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.325
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1099-1395
pISSN - 0894-3230
DOI - 10.1002/poc.1830
Subject(s) - aromaticity , electron counting , periodic table , planar , space (punctuation) , electron , chemistry , extension (predicate logic) , table (database) , period (music) , theoretical physics , molecule , pure mathematics , crystallography , physics , quantum mechanics , mathematics , computer science , organic chemistry , data mining , acoustics , programming language , computer graphics (images) , operating system
To describe aromaticity of planar and three‐dimensional molecules, different electron counting rules are employed. Here, the relationship between the Hückel 4 n  + 2 rule and the Hirsch 2( n  + 1) 2 rule is established based on formal approach considering the electrons as objects in an arbitrary n ‐dimensional space of states . Two types of three‐dimensional aromaticity, referred to as ‘spherical’ (following the 4 n  + 2 electron counting rule) and ‘spatial’ (following the 2( n  + 1) 2 electron counting rule) are distinguished. A conclusion concerning the boundaries of the Periodic Table of Elements is made based on the same formal approach that no g ‐ (or higher) elements can exist and that possible extension of the Periodic Table beyond the seventh period must be followed by filling of the 8p or inner 6f or 7d levels. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom