Premium
Cancer Patients' Perception of Usefulness of Wearable Exercise Trackers
Author(s) -
Ng Amy,
Gupta Ekta,
Bansal Swati,
Fontillas Rhodora C.,
Amos Charles E.,
Williams Janet L.,
Dibaj Seyedeh,
Bruera Eduardo
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
pmandr
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.617
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1934-1563
pISSN - 1934-1482
DOI - 10.1002/pmrj.12475
Subject(s) - wearable computer , medicine , activity tracker , rehabilitation , physical therapy , wearable technology , bittorrent tracker , outpatient clinic , physical medicine and rehabilitation , population , physical activity , eye tracking , computer science , artificial intelligence , embedded system , environmental health
Objective To determine the feasibility and perception of usefulness of wearable trackers in inpatient and outpatient cancer rehabilitation patients. Design Prospective study. Setting Acute inpatient rehabilitation and outpatient clinic at a tertiary cancer center. Participants Adult cancer patients (N = 100). Interventions Participants were provided with wearable trackers for the duration of the study. Main Outcome Measures Survey regarding feasibility (as defined as equal or more than two‐thirds of participants reporting use of the wearable tracker) and usefulness of the wearable tracker and Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS‐FS) in both inpatient and outpatient populations. Activity minutes, number of steps, heart rate, and sleep data were collected from the wearable tracker. Results Patients reported the use of a wearable tracker is feasible, with 48/50 (96%) outpatients and 47/50 (94%) inpatients reported wearing the wearable tracker daily and 37/49 (76%) outpatients and 29/50 (58%) inpatients reported that they would continue to wear the wearable tracker after this study. The majority of cancer patients (41/49 [84%] of outpatient and 33/50 [66%] of inpatient patients) reported that the wearable tracker was useful and 41/49 (84%) outpatients and 27/50 (54%) inpatients perceived the wearable tracker as helping to increase physical activity. Conclusions The use of wearable trackers in cancer patients is feasible and patients perceive wearable trackers as useful in both the inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation setting. Physical activity in these patients was better in the outpatient population, as expected because of less medical acuity.