Premium
Occupational and Physical Therapy Activities and Level of Effort in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: Association With Functional Outcomes
Author(s) -
Zarshenas Sareh,
Colantonio Angela,
Horn Susan D.,
Jaglal Susan,
Jacob Binu,
Cullen Nora
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
pmandr
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.617
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1934-1563
pISSN - 1934-1482
DOI - 10.1002/pmrj.12260
Subject(s) - medicine , rasch model , rehabilitation , functional independence measure , physical therapy , cognition , traumatic brain injury , confounding , physical medicine and rehabilitation , occupational therapy , population , confidence interval , psychology , psychiatry , developmental psychology , environmental health
Background Although some attention has been given to the association of functional outcomes with rehabilitation intensity, the evidence is still sparse in this field. Objective To investigate the effect of inpatient rehabilitation (IR) on discharge cognitive and motor function and the association of time spent in occupational and physical therapy and level of effort with cognitive and motor function in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Design Secondary analysis of TBI‐Practice Based Evidence dataset. Settings Inpatient rehabilitation. Participants One hundred forty‐nine patients with TBI who were consecutively admitted for IR between 2008 and 2011 in Ontario, Canada. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measurements Admission and discharge Functional Independence Measure‐Rasch Cognitive and Motor Scores. Results Patients showed significant improvement in cognitive and motor function from admission to discharge ( P < .0001). After controlling for confounding factors, discharge FIM‐Rasch cognitive and motor scores were not associated with either level of effort or time spent in physical therapy activities. Discharge motor, but not cognitive function, was associated with more time spent in the complex (β = 0.20, confidence interval [CI] 0.005, 0.05) and less time spent in simple OT activities (β = −0.13, CI −0.13, −0.01). Conclusion This study provides valuable information for clinicians about the effectiveness of IR on the improvement of motor and cognitive outcomes and the importance of considering the amount of time spent in activities based on their level of complexity rather than the total time of therapy to improve motor outcomes in this population. Level of Evidence III