Premium
Preliminary field trial of a putative research algorithm for diagnosing ICD‐11 personality disorders in psychiatric patients: 2. Proposed trait domains
Author(s) -
Kim YoulRi,
Tyrer Peter,
Lee HongSeock,
Kim SungGon,
Hwang SoonTaek,
Lee Gi Young,
Mulder Roger
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
personality and mental health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.193
H-Index - 22
eISSN - 1932-863X
pISSN - 1932-8621
DOI - 10.1002/pmh.1305
Subject(s) - psychology , trait , discriminant validity , personality , clinical psychology , personality disorders , psychiatry , psychometrics , social psychology , computer science , internal consistency , programming language
This field trial examines the discriminant validity of five trait domains of the originally proposed research algorithm for diagnosing International Classification of Diseases (ICD)‐11 personality disorders. This trial was carried out in South Korea where a total of 124 patients with personality disorder participated in the study. Participants were assessed using originally proposed monothetic trait domains of asocial–schizoid, antisocial–dissocial, anxious‐dependent, emotionally unstable and anankastic‐obsessional groups of the research algorithm in ICD‐11. Their assessments were compared to those from the Personality Assessment Schedule interview, and the five‐factor model (FFM). A total of 48.4% of patients were found to have pathology in two or more domains. In the discriminant analysis, 64.2% of the grouped cases of the originally proposed ICD‐11 domains were correctly classified by the five domain categories using the Personality Assessment Schedule, with the highest accuracy in the anankastic‐obsessional domain and the lowest accuracy in the emotionally unstable domain. In comparison, the asocial–schizoid, anxious‐dependent and the emotionally unstable domains were moderately correlated with the FFM, whereas the anankastic‐obsessional or antisocial–dissocial domains were not significantly correlated with the FFM. In this field trial, we demonstrated the limited discriminant and the convergent validities of the originally proposed trait domains of the research algorithm for diagnosing ICD‐11 personality disorder. The results suggest that the anankastic, asocial and dissocial domains show good discrimination, whereas the anxious‐dependent and emotionally unstable ones overlap too much and have been subsequently revised. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.