Premium
Is fluency‐based story retell a good indicator of reading comprehension?
Author(s) -
Bellinger Jillian M.,
DiPerna James C.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
psychology in the schools
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.738
H-Index - 75
eISSN - 1520-6807
pISSN - 0033-3085
DOI - 10.1002/pits.20563
Subject(s) - fluency , comprehension , reading comprehension , psychology , reading (process) , literacy , reliability (semiconductor) , cognitive psychology , measure (data warehouse) , developmental psychology , audiology , linguistics , mathematics education , computer science , medicine , pedagogy , philosophy , power (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics , database
Abstract This study examined the reliability and validity of scores on a fluency‐based measure of reading comprehension. The Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS; 6th ed. revised) Retell Fluency (RTF), Oral Reading Fluency (DORF), and Woodcock Johnson III NU Tests of Achievement (WJ‐III NU ACH) Reading Comprehension measures were administered to fourth‐grade students. Results indicated a large difference between real time and recorded retell fluency scores for each passage. In addition, students' retell fluency scores had a low correlation with their reading comprehension scores. In light of these findings, practitioners may want to exercise caution in using fluency‐based story‐retell scores as a measure of reading comprehension. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.