Premium
Much ado about something: The weight of evidence for PCB effects on neuropsychological function
Author(s) -
Schantz Susan L.,
Gardiner Joseph C.,
Gasior Donna M.,
McCaffrey Robert J.,
Sweeney Anne M.,
Humphrey Harold E.B.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
psychology in the schools
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.738
H-Index - 75
eISSN - 1520-6807
pISSN - 0033-3085
DOI - 10.1002/pits.20008
Subject(s) - psychology , neuropsychology , function (biology) , developmental psychology , clinical psychology , cognition , psychiatry , evolutionary biology , biology
Abstract D.V. Cicchetti, A.S. Kaufman, and S.S. Sparrow (this issue) use six criteria to evaluate the published findings from seven different studies of PCB exposure and neuropsychological function. They point out a number of weaknesses or flaws in each study and conclude that these weaknesses make the overall conclusion that PCB exposure negatively impacts neuropsychological function untenable. While we agree that all of the studies have weaknesses, we take issue with some of the specific criticisms Cicchetti and colleagues make including their comments on exposure assessment, statistical control of multiple comparisons, validity of test instruments and clinical relevance of the findings. We argue that—despite the weaknesses of each individual study—the consistency of effects across studies is remarkable, and we conclude that the weight of evidence for a negative association between PCB exposure and intellectual function in childhood is very strong. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Psychol Schs 41: 669–679, 2004.