Premium
A case study on accelerated light‐ and elevated temperature‐induced degradation testing of commercial multi‐crystalline silicon passivated emitter and rear cell modules
Author(s) -
Ciesla Alison,
Kim Moonyong,
Wright Matthew,
Zafirovska Iskra,
Chen Daniel,
Hallam Brett,
Chan Catherine
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
progress in photovoltaics: research and applications
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.286
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1099-159X
pISSN - 1062-7995
DOI - 10.1002/pip.3455
Subject(s) - crystalline silicon , degradation (telecommunications) , reliability (semiconductor) , common emitter , photovoltaic system , materials science , open circuit voltage , silicon , voltage , short circuit , passivation , optoelectronics , reliability engineering , power (physics) , computer science , electrical engineering , nanotechnology , physics , engineering , telecommunications , thermodynamics , layer (electronics)
Abstract Light‐ and elevated temperature‐induced degradation (LeTID) can have significant and long‐lasting effects on silicon photovoltaic modules. Its behaviour is complex, showing highly variable degradation under different conditions or due to minor changes in device fabrication. Here, we show the large difference in LeTID kinetics and extents in multi‐crystalline passivated emitter and rear cell (multi‐PERC) modules from four different manufacturers. Varied accelerated testing conditions are found to impact the maximum extent of degradation in different ways for different manufacturers complicating the ability to develop a universal predictive model for field degradation. Relative changes in the open‐circuit voltage ( V OC ) have previously been used to assess extents of LeTID; however, due to the greater impact of the defect at lower injection, the V OC is shown to degrade less than half as much as the voltage at maximum power point ( V MPP ). The MPP current ( I MPP ) and fill factor (FF) also degrade significantly, having an even larger overall impact on the power output. These observations imply that currently employed methodologies for testing LeTID are inadequate, which limits the reliability of future predictive models. In light of this, the field must develop a more holistic approach to analysing LeTID‐impacted modules, which incorporates information about changes under MPP conditions. This will allow for a much clearer understanding of LeTID in the field, which will assist the performance of future PV systems.