Premium
Miscibility, morphology and thermal properties of poly( para ‐dioxanone)/poly( D , L ‐lactide) blends
Author(s) -
Bai Wei,
Zhang Zhiping,
Li Qing,
Chen DongLiang,
Chen HeChun,
Zhao Na,
Xiong ChengDong
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
polymer international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.592
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1097-0126
pISSN - 0959-8103
DOI - 10.1002/pi.2512
Subject(s) - miscibility , materials science , glass transition , crystallinity , polyester , biocompatibility , polymer , chemical engineering , biodegradation , polymer blend , biodegradable polymer , morphology (biology) , polymer chemistry , composite material , copolymer , organic chemistry , chemistry , biology , engineering , metallurgy , genetics
Abstract BACKGROUND: Poly( para ‐dioxanone) (PPDO) is a biodegradable polyester with excellent biodegradability, bioabsorbability, biocompatibility and mechanical flexibility. However, its high cost and relatively fast degradation rate have hindered the development of commercial applications. Blending with other polymers is a simple and convenient way of modifying the properties of aliphatic polyesters. Poly( D , L ‐lactide) (PDLLA) is another polyester that has been extensively studied for biomedical applications due to its biocompatibility and suitable degradation rate. However, to our knowledge, blends of PPDO/PDLLA have not been reported in the literature. RESULTS: A series of biodegradable polymers were blended by solution co‐precipitation of PPDO and PDLLA in various blend ratios. The miscibility, morphology and thermal properties of the materials were investigated. DSC curves for all blends revealed two discrete glass transition temperatures which matched the values for pure PPDO and PDLLA. SEM images of fracture surfaces displayed evidence of phase separation consistent with the DSC results. The contact angles increased with the addition of PDLLA. CONCLUSION: PPDO/PDLLA blends exhibit two distinct glass transition temperatures that remain nearly constant and correspond to the glass transition temperatures of the homopolymers for all blend compositions, indicating that blends of PPDO and PDLLA are immiscible. Images of the surface obtained using SEM were also suggestive of a two‐phase material. The crystallinity of the PPDO phase in the blends was affected by the PDLLA content. The mechanical properties of the blends changed dramatically with composition. Adding PDLLA makes the blends less hydrophilic than PPDO. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry