Premium
Association between the timing of asthma diagnosis and medication use during pregnancy
Author(s) -
Issa Simone,
Longo Cristina,
Forget Amélie,
Blais Lucie
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
pharmacotherapy: the journal of human pharmacology and drug therapy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.227
H-Index - 109
eISSN - 1875-9114
pISSN - 0277-0008
DOI - 10.1002/phar.2511
Subject(s) - medicine , pregnancy , asthma , cohort , poisson regression , medical prescription , cohort study , retrospective cohort study , rate ratio , obstetrics , population , confidence interval , pediatrics , genetics , environmental health , pharmacology , biology
Study objective To assess whether asthma medication use during pregnancy differs in women newly diagnosed with asthma early in pregnancy (first 19 weeks of pregnancy) compared to those newly diagnosed up to 2 years pre‐pregnancy. Design A retrospective population‐based cohort study. Data source To conduct this study, we used the Quebec Asthma and Pregnancy Database (QAPD) constructed by linking two administrative health databases from the province of Quebec (Canada): the Régie de l’Assurance Maladie du Québec and Maintenance et Exploitation des Données pour l’Étude de la Clientèle Hospitalière databases. Patients A cohort comprising pregnant women newly diagnosed with asthma at any time in the 2 years prior to pregnancy or during the first 19 weeks of pregnancy was selected from the QAPD. Measurements and Main Results We assessed the number of filled prescriptions of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), ICS/long‐acting β2 agonists (LABA), and short‐acting β2 agonists (SABA), as well as the number of days’ supply of oral corticosteroid (OCS) from the 20 th week of pregnancy until delivery. Poisson regression was used to compare the rates of asthma medication use in women diagnosed pre‐pregnancy versus early in pregnancy. The cohort included 1731 women newly diagnosed with asthma pre‐pregnancy and 359 women newly diagnosed with asthma early in pregnancy. Women diagnosed early in pregnancy were more likely to use ICS (adjusted rate ratio: 1.9, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6–2.3) and SABA (adjusted rate ratio: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.7–2.4) from the 20th week of pregnancy until delivery than those newly diagnosed pre‐pregnancy. No significant differences were observed in the use of ICS/LABA [adjusted rate ratio: 0.9, 95% CI: 0.7–1.3] and OCS [adjusted rate ratio: 0.8, 95% CI: 0.6–1.2]. Conclusion The higher use of ICS and SABA observed in women newly diagnosed with asthma early in pregnancy may suggest a more persistent asthma phenotype caused by pregnancy‐triggered hormonal changes.