Premium
Accuracy of the Structured Medication History Assessment Tool (Med HAT ) Compared with Recorded Real‐Time Medication Use
Author(s) -
Heard Ken,
Anderson Victoria E.,
Dart Richard C.,
Green Jody L.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
pharmacotherapy: the journal of human pharmacology and drug therapy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.227
H-Index - 109
eISSN - 1875-9114
pISSN - 0277-0008
DOI - 10.1002/phar.1750
Subject(s) - medical prescription , medicine , observational study , pharmacoepidemiology , medical history , adverse effect , recall , pediatrics , psychology , pharmacology , cognitive psychology
Study Objective Medication histories are collected to measure drug exposure in epidemiologic studies, to identify adverse drug events and in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of a structured medication history obtained by using the Medication History Assessment Tool (Med HAT ) with a medication diary in which subjects recorded real‐time medication use. Design Prospective observational study. Setting Outpatient research center. Subjects Sixty‐seven adult healthy volunteers. Interventions Subjects were provided diaries to record the product name, dose quantity, and time that they used a prescription or nonprescription medication, supplement, or vitamin. After a minimum of 30 continuous days of diary use, a final interview was conducted, and medication history data were collected by using the Med HAT . Measurements and Main Results We compared the medications reported during the interview with the medications recorded in the diary for each day to determine the accuracy of the verbal history. The primary outcome was the proportion of matches for each day for each subject. Overall accuracy for medication use for the day preceding the interview was 90%, and accuracy during the 30 days preceding the interview was 76%. Recall was higher for subjects taking prescription medications, those who had more recent medication use, older subjects, and subjects taking a higher proportion of prescription medications. Conclusion The Med HAT system provided relatively high accuracy for immediate past use and for prescription medications and may offer better accuracy than other methods. Medication histories are often inaccurate, however, and may represent an important source of misclassification in epidemiologic studies. Thus medication histories alone should be used cautiously when measuring associations between drug exposure and health outcomes.