z-logo
Premium
Evaluation of a Community Pharmacy–Based Screening Questionnaire to Identify Patients at Risk for Drug Therapy Problems
Author(s) -
Pammett Robert T.,
Blackburn David,
Taylor Jeff,
Mansell Kerry,
Kwan Debbie,
Papoushek Christine,
Jorgenson Derek
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
pharmacotherapy: the journal of human pharmacology and drug therapy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.227
H-Index - 109
eISSN - 1875-9114
pISSN - 0277-0008
DOI - 10.1002/phar.1633
Subject(s) - medicine , pharmacy , medical prescription , drug , pharmacotherapy , pharmacist , adverse effect , regimen , family medicine , physical therapy , pharmacology
Study Objective To determine if a short screening questionnaire can identify patients at risk for drug therapy problems ( DTP s) in a community pharmacy setting. Design Self‐administered questionnaire. Setting Three community pharmacies in Saskatoon, Canada. Patients Forty‐nine adults who were picking up a refill prescription for a medication that had remained stable over the past 6 months (i.e., no changes to drug, dose, or regimen) during 4 consecutive weeks at each of the three pharmacies between November 2013 and February 2014. Measurements and Main Results All patients completed a self‐administered screening questionnaire and underwent a blinded comprehensive medication assessment with a clinical pharmacist. Agreement between the screening questionnaire responses and responses based on information from the medication assessment were assessed with Cohen's κ coefficient. The DTP s identified during the medication assessments were categorized in one of the eight standard DTP categories: unnecessary drug therapy, inappropriate drug, subtherapeutic dose, supratherapeutic dose, drug therapy required, adverse drug reaction, noncompliance, and other or unsure. The DTP s were also assigned a severity—mild, moderate, or severe—using adapted Schneider criteria. The number and severity of DTP s identified were compared among patients categorized as high versus low risk for DTP s as determined by the questionnaire responses. Of the 49 patients who completed the study, 18 (37%) were high risk and 31 (63%) low risk. The agreement between risk categorization based on the screening questionnaire and medication assessment was very good (κ = 0.91, p<0.01). Also, patients identified as high risk on the screening questionnaire had a mean of 3.7 (p<0.01) more DTP s than low‐risk patients. Seventeen (94%) of the 18 high‐risk patients had at least one moderate or severe DTP compared with 15 (48%) of the 31 low‐risk patients. Conclusion The screening questionnaire was a reliable method for identifying patients in community pharmacies who have a large number of DTP s.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom