Premium
Relative Bioavailability of Orally Administered Fosphenytoin Sodium Injection Compared with Phenytoin Sodium Injection in Healthy Volunteers
Author(s) -
Kaucher Kevin A.,
Acquisto Nicole M.,
Rao Gauri G.,
Kaufman David C.,
Huntress Jeff D.,
Forrest Alan,
Haas Curtis E.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
pharmacotherapy: the journal of human pharmacology and drug therapy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.227
H-Index - 109
eISSN - 1875-9114
pISSN - 0277-0008
DOI - 10.1002/phar.1589
Subject(s) - pharmacokinetics , bioavailability , cmax , crossover study , medicine , oral administration , pharmacology , confidence interval , sodium , bioequivalence , chemistry , placebo , alternative medicine , organic chemistry , pathology
Study Objective To describe the pharmacokinetics of fosphenytoin ( FPHT ) sodium injection when administered orally, and to determine the relative oral bioavailability ( F REL ) of FPHT sodium injection compared with PHT sodium injection based on pharmacokinetic modeling in healthy volunteers. Design Open‐label, randomized, single‐dose, two‐period, two‐sequence crossover study. Setting University‐affiliated clinical research center funded by the National Center of Research Resources. Subjects Ten healthy adult volunteers. Intervention Subjects were randomized to receive a single oral dose of either PHT sodium injection or FPHT sodium injection at a dose equivalent to 400 mg PHT acid. Blood samples were collected at baseline (just prior to administration) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after dose administration. After a 7–14‐day washout period, the subjects underwent the same study procedures for administration of the other agent ( PHT or FPHT ). Measurements and Main Results The mean age and weight of the 10 subjects were 37 years and 72.5 kg, respectively, and the mean dose was 5.6 mg/kg based on PHT acid equivalence. The mean F REL of FPHT was 1.21 (95% confidence interval [ CI ] 1.07–1.35). Serum PHT concentrations were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. The median (range) maximum serum concentration (C max ) values were significantly higher after FPHT administration compared with PHT : 10.7 (9.0–19.4) mg/L versus 5.0 (3.2–8.9) mg/L (p=0.002). The PHT concentration after oral administration of FPHT displayed faster absorption compared with PHT , with a median (range) time to reach C max of 1.0 (0.5–2.0) hours versus 6.0 (2.0–24.0) hours (p=0.008). All subjects completed the study without any serious adverse events reported. Conclusion FPHT sodium injection given orally was absorbed more rapidly and to a significantly greater extent than PHT sodium injection given orally to healthy volunteers. Further evaluation of oral FPHT as an alternative in patients requiring enteral feedings is warranted.