Premium
Molecular weight distribution of polyethylene terephthalate in homogeneous, continuous‐flow‐stirred tank reactors
Author(s) -
Kumar Anil,
Gupta Santosh K.,
Somu N.
Publication year - 1982
Publication title -
polymer engineering and science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.503
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1548-2634
pISSN - 0032-3888
DOI - 10.1002/pen.760220508
Subject(s) - polyester , materials science , continuous stirred tank reactor , dispersity , polyethylene terephthalate , polymer chemistry , ethylene , polymer , monomer , polymerization , molar mass distribution , branching (polymer chemistry) , chemical engineering , residence time distribution , thermodynamics , organic chemistry , chemistry , catalysis , composite material , engineering , inclusion (mineral) , physics
Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) formation in homogeneous, continuous‐flow‐stirred tank reactors (HCSTRs) operating at steady state has been simulated. The feed to the reactor is assumed to consist of the monomer bis‐(hydroxyethyl) terephthalate and monofunctional compound ( MF 1 ) cetyl alcohol. The overall polymerization is assumed to consist of the polycondensation, reaction with monofunctional compounds, redistribution, and cyclization reactions. At a given time, the reaction mass consists of polyester molecules ( P n ), polyester molecules with an ending of molecules of monofunctional compound ( MF n ), and cyclic polymers ( C n ). A mass balance for each of these species in the reactor gives rise to a set of algebraic equations to be solved simultaneously. The MWD calculations show that the redistribution reaction plays a major role and cannot be ignored, This result is in contrast lo the observation for semi‐batch reactors, for which redistribution becomes important when the cyclization reaction is included. For the same residence times of semi‐batch and HCSTRs, the latter gives considerably lower‐number average molecular weight, N av , and polydispersity index, ρ. However, for the same conversions, the ρ for CSTR is higher. The concentration of the monofurctional compound, [MF 1 ] 0 , in the feed and the reactor temperature both influence ρ, but the effect is small within the range studied.