z-logo
Premium
Rubber‐toughened polypropylene/acrylonitrile‐ co ‐butadiene‐ co ‐styrene blends: Morphology and mechanical properties
Author(s) -
Šlouf Miroslav,
Kolařík Jan,
Kotek Jiří
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
polymer engineering and science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.503
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1548-2634
pISSN - 0032-3888
DOI - 10.1002/pen.20727
Subject(s) - materials science , composite material , ultimate tensile strength , polypropylene , natural rubber , izod impact strength test , polymer blend , modulus , polystyrene , polymer , copolymer
The RTPP/ABS (rubber toughened polypropylene/poly (acrylonitrile‐ co ‐butadiene‐ co ‐styrene) blends, both noncompatibilized and compatibilized with polypropylene‐ g ‐polystyrene, were prepared by melt mixing in a Brabender Plasti‐Corder. As the torque ratio of RTPP and ABS was about 2, phase cocontinuity in the blends was achieved at ABS volume fractions around 0.16, which was evidenced by both microscopic analysis and mechanical testing. A new microscopic and image analysis technique was introduced, whose combination provides two semiquantitative parameters: structure roughness and structure cocontinuity. The latter parameter is closely associated with the predictive scheme based on the equivalent box model and percolation theory, which was used in this study. The predicted mechanical properties were confronted with the experimental data for tensile modulus, yield strength, and tensile impact strength. While the modulus of noncompatibilized blends is reasonably fitted by the model, the compatibilizer accounts for a positive deviation attributed to a strong interaction between the compatibilizer and the matrix. The yield strength of noncompatibilized blends indicates poor interfacial adhesion, which is so enhanced by the compatibilizer that no phase debonding occurs before yielding. Tensile impact strength, in contrast to modulus and yield strength, passes through a deep minimum for both types of blends; two tentative explanations of this detrimental behavior were suggested. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 47:582–592, 2007. © 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here