Premium
Numerical analysis of injection molding of glass fiber reinforced thermoplastics. Part 2: Fiber orientation
Author(s) -
Greene Joseph P.,
Wilkes James O.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
polymer engineering and science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.503
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1548-2634
pISSN - 0032-3888
DOI - 10.1002/pen.11747
Subject(s) - materials science , molding (decorative) , flow (mathematics) , fiber , composite material , orientation (vector space) , mechanics , isothermal process , geometry , thermodynamics , physics , mathematics
Numerical predictions of fiber orientation during injection molding of fiber‐filled thermoplastics are compared to measurements. The numerical work successfully describes the flow of fiber‐filled plastic during injection molding, using finite‐difference solutions for the transport equations and marker particles to track the flow front. The flow is modeled as a 2‐D, non‐isothermal, free‐surface flow with a new viscosity model dependent upon temperature, pressure, and fiber concentration. The fiber orientation is based upon solution to the Fokker‐Planke equation. The comparison demonstrates fair agreement between predicted fiber orientation and experimental results for slow and fast injection speeds. For the slow speed case at 10 and 20 wt% fibers, the numerical and experimental works show that the fibers are more random at the flow front than at the centerline, and that the fibers become more aligned as they flow from the gate to the midstream region. At fast injection speeds, the agreement between the numerical and experimental works is not as good as at slow injection speed. Possible explanations for the discrepancies are that the flow is assumed to be simple shear when injection molding is known to be a pressure‐driven flow, the fibers have an initial orientation for the runner rather than the assumed random orientation, the fibers that were displayed from the camera were more oriented just behind the flow front (owing to the fast injection speed), and the orientation requires more than a 2‐D video image to represent a 3‐D fiber orientation.