z-logo
Premium
Fracture toughness characterization of a PC/ABS blend under different strain rates by various J‐integral methods
Author(s) -
Lu MingLuen,
Chiou KuoChan,
Chang FengChih
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
polymer engineering and science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.503
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1548-2634
pISSN - 0032-3888
DOI - 10.1002/pen.10627
Subject(s) - materials science , hysteresis , composite material , fracture toughness , crosshead , fracture mechanics , j integral , strain energy release rate , toughness , offset (computer science) , displacement (psychology) , polycarbonate , flexural strength , psychology , physics , quantum mechanics , computer science , psychotherapist , programming language
A published, nonconventional J ‐integral method, based on the hysteresis energy and the ASTM E813 methods, has been employed to test the fracture toughness of a polycarbonate (PC)/acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene (ABS) blend. The critical J values ( J Ic ) at crosshead speeds ranging from 0.5 to 20 mm/min obtained from the hysteresis energy method are ∼10 to 20% higher than those obtained from the E813–81 method and ∼50 to 70% lower than those obtained from the E813–87 method. However, the hysteresis energy method results in comparable J Ic values with a modified ASTM E813–87 method when the 0.2 mm offset line is replaced with a 0.1 mm offset line. The critical displacements in terms of the onset of crack initiation, determined from the plots of hysteresis energy vs. displacement, hysteresis ratio vs. displacement, and the true crack growth length vs. displacement, are fairly close in value. This indicates the critical crack initiation and the corresponding J Ic obtained from this hysteresis energy method indeed represent the actual physical event of the onset of crack initiation.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here