Premium
Quantitative determination of short‐chain branching content and distribution in commercial polyethylenes by thermally fractionated differential scanning calorimetry
Author(s) -
Zhang Mingqian,
Wanke Sieghard E.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
polymer engineering and science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.503
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1548-2634
pISSN - 0032-3888
DOI - 10.1002/pen.10159
Subject(s) - differential scanning calorimetry , materials science , branching (polymer chemistry) , post metallocene catalyst , analytical chemistry (journal) , metallocene , copolymer , polymer chemistry , fractionation , polymerization , chromatography , chemistry , composite material , polymer , thermodynamics , physics
A method for rapid quantitative analysis of the content and distribution of short chain branching (SCB) for α‐olefin/ethylene copolymers based on thermally fractionated DSC is presented. Eight commercial polyethylenes, four made with conventional Ziegler‐Natta catalysts and four made with metallocene catalysts, were analyzed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), after having been thermally segregated by successive nucleation annealing (SNA). The polyethylenes were also analyzed by temperature rising elution fractionation (TREF) and carbon‐13 nuclear magnetic resonance ( 13 C‐NMR). The SNA‐DSC procedure segregates polyethylenes according to methylene sequence lengths (MSL). The relationship between DSC melting temperature and SCB content was obtained by calibration with linear hydrocarbons; TREF results were not used in the SNA‐DSC calibration. Deconvolution of the SNA‐DSC endotherms yielded estimates of the average SCB contents and SCB distributions. The SCB contents obtained from the SNA‐DSC for linear low density polyethylenes agreed very well with the SCB contents obtained by 13 C‐NMR and TREF, and the SCB distributions measured by SNA‐DSC were very similar to those obtained by TREF. The SCB contents obtained by SNA‐DSC for ultra‐low density polyethylenes, made with metallocene catalysts, were about 20% lower than the values obtained by 13 C‐NMR; the values obtained by TREF were even lower.