z-logo
Premium
Utilization of parenteral anti‐infective agents in the medical emergency unit of a tertiary care hospital: an observational study
Author(s) -
Gupta M.,
Malhotra S.,
Chandra K. K.,
Sharma N.,
Pandhi P.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.023
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1099-1557
pISSN - 1053-8569
DOI - 10.1002/pds.927
Subject(s) - medicine , medical prescription , tertiary care , metronidazole , emergency medicine , pharmacy , observational study , intensive care unit , antibiotics , emergency department , intensive care medicine , pharmacology , family medicine , microbiology and biotechnology , biology , psychiatry
A pharmacy based prescription audit was undertaken in the medical emergency unit of a tertiary care hospital to determine the frequency of prescribing of parenteral anti‐infective agents. During the study period, 885 patients were screened. The analysis was done for the number of parenteral anti‐microbials in each prescription frequency of individual drug prescribe number and dose unit (DDD), frequency of age and sex, site of infection and daily cost incurred by the patient. It was found that 400 patients (45.2%) received parenteral anti‐infective agents. Cephalosporins, aminoglycosides and metronidazole accounted for about 70% of total antimicrobial use. More than 50% of patients had culture sensitivity reports available. The mean (standard deviation, SD) daily cost of antibiotic was US $ 3.8 (7.7), median; range 2 (0.1–85.7). Two anti‐microbials per prescription were indicated in most of the patients (43.88). In conclusion we have provided an overview of parenteral anti‐infective use in medical emergency, which may serve as a basis for intervention and improvement in prescribing pattern of parenteral anti‐microbials. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here