Premium
Patient approach and experience regarding complementary medicine: survey among hospitalized patients in a university hospital
Author(s) -
Rosen Irit,
Azzam Zaher S.,
Levi Tiferet,
Braun Eyal,
Krivoy Norberto
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.023
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1099-1557
pISSN - 1053-8569
DOI - 10.1002/pds.840
Subject(s) - medicine , complementary medicine , family medicine , alternative medicine , intervention (counseling) , adverse effect , conventional medicine , nursing , pathology
Abstract Purpose To characterize the local population that turns to complementary medicine. Methods Participants were selected randomly: Medicine [A] (201 patients); Surgery [B] (100 patients); Control [C] (128 patients). The answers to the first two questions determined whether the questionnaire was to be completed. Results More females sought complementary medicine treatment, with no significant demographic differences among the groups. Nearly 20% of the subjects had academic education while 43% had completed high school. The results of the 16 significant questions were statistically different when comparing groups C and A ( p = 0.025) and B ( p = 0.011) respectively. A total of 16%, 12.4% and 9% of the subjects respectively preferred a physician MD as their complementary medicine practitioner and 49% [C], 34% [A] and 29% [B] respectively, favored teaching complementary medicine in medical and nursing schools. Conclusions A total of 37% [C], 21% [B] and 27% [A] of the subjects experienced complementary medicine intervention at least once. The percentage of individuals holding academic degrees was higher in the group utilizing complementary medicine than those who did not. Only 21% of C and A groups and 12% of B group knew about adverse reactions to complementary therapies. More than 30% favored ‘legalizing’ complementary medicine. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.