Premium
Rivaroxaban was found to be noninferior to warfarin in routine clinical care: A retrospective noninferiority cohort replication study
Author(s) -
Althunian Turki A.,
Boer Anthonius,
Groenwold Rolf H. H.,
Rengerink Katrien O.,
Souverein Patrick C.,
Klungel Olaf H.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.023
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1099-1557
pISSN - 1053-8569
DOI - 10.1002/pds.5065
Subject(s) - rivaroxaban , medicine , warfarin , hazard ratio , atrial fibrillation , stroke (engine) , clinical trial , cohort study , cohort , retrospective cohort study , confidence interval , mechanical engineering , engineering
Purpose To compare the effectiveness and safety of a drug in daily practice with the outcomes of a target non‐inferiority trial by rigorously mimickingin an observational study the trial's design features. Methods This cohort study was conducted using the British Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) to emulate the ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation) trial. Patients with atrial fibrillation who were newly prescribed (>=12 months of no use) either rivaroxaban or warfarinfrom October 2008 to December 2017 were included. Non‐inferiority of rivaroxaban to warfarin in the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism was assessed in different analysis populations (intention‐to‐treat [ITT], per‐protocol [PP], and as‐treated populations) using a hazardratio (HR) of 1.46 as the non‐inferiority margin. Major bleeding (safety outcome) was also assessed and compared to that of the target trial. All outcomes were analyzed using Cox‐proportional hazard analyses. Results We included 25,473 incident users of rivaroxaban (n=4,008) or warfarin(n=21,465). Similar to the trial, non‐inferiority in the primary out come was demonstrated in all three analysis populations: HR=1.04 (95%CI 0.84 to 1.30) (ITT), HR=0.98 (95%CI 0.70 to 1.38) (PP), and HR=1.11 (95%CI 0.86 to 1.42) (as‐treated). Risk of major bleeding was also similar to the target trial. Conclusion The results of this study provide supportive evidence to the effectiveness of rivaroxaban and adds knowledge on the usefulness of emulating a non‐inferiority trial to assess drug effectiveness.