Premium
Impact of Florida's prescription drug monitoring program and pill mill law on high‐risk patients: A comparative interrupted time series analysis
Author(s) -
Chang HsienYen,
Murimi Irene,
Faul Mark,
Rutkow Lainie,
Alexander G. Caleb
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.023
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1099-1557
pISSN - 1053-8569
DOI - 10.1002/pds.4404
Subject(s) - medicine , medical prescription , pill , concomitant , opioid , confidence interval , pharmacoepidemiology , emergency medicine , relative risk , pharmacology , receptor
Purpose We quantified the effects of Florida's prescription drug monitoring program and pill mill law on high‐risk patients. Methods We used QuintilesIMS LRx Lifelink data to identify patients receiving prescription opioids in Florida (intervention state, N: 1.13 million) and Georgia (control state, N: 0.54 million). The preintervention, intervention, and postintervention periods were July 2010 to June 2011, July 2011 to September 2011, and October 2011 to September 2012. We identified 3 types of high‐risk patients: (1) concomitant users: patients with concomitant use of benzodiazepines and opioids; (2) chronic users: long‐term, high‐dose, opioid users; and (3) opioid shoppers: patients receiving opioids from multiple sources. We compared changes in opioid prescriptions between Florida and Georgia before and after policy implementation among high‐risk/low‐risk patients. Our monthly measures included (1) average morphine milligram equivalent per transaction, (2) total opioid volume across all prescriptions, (3) average days supplied per transaction, and (4) total number of opioid prescriptions dispensed. Results Among opioid‐receiving individuals in Florida, 6.62% were concomitant users, 1.96% were chronic users, and 0.46% were opioid shoppers. Following policy implementation, Florida's high‐risk patients experienced relative reductions in morphine milligram equivalent (opioid shoppers: −1.08 mg/month, 95% confidence interval [CI] −1.62 to −0.54), total opioid volume (chronic users: −4.58 kg/month, CI −5.41 to −3.76), and number of dispensed opioid prescriptions (concomitant users: −640 prescriptions/month, CI −950 to −340). Low‐risk patients generally did not experience statistically significantly relative reductions. Conclusions Compared with Georgia, Florida's prescription drug monitoring program and pill mill law were associated with large relative reductions in prescription opioid utilization among high‐risk patients.