z-logo
Premium
Post‐marketing monitoring of intussusception after rotavirus vaccination in Japan
Author(s) -
Bauchau Vincent,
Van Holle Lionel,
Mahaux Olivia,
Holl Katsiaryna,
Sugiyama Keiji,
Buyse Hubert
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.023
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1099-1557
pISSN - 1053-8569
DOI - 10.1002/pds.3800
Subject(s) - medicine , vaccination , rotavirus , confidence interval , rotavirus vaccine , incidence (geometry) , rate ratio , intussusception (medical disorder) , pediatrics , demography , surgery , immunology , diarrhea , physics , sociology , optics
Purpose Rotarix TM was launched in November 2011 in Japan to prevent rotavirus gastroenteritis. Some studies suggest that Rotarix TM may have a temporal association with a risk of intussusception (IS). We assessed a possible association between IS and Rotarix TM vaccination in Japan. Methods All IS cases spontaneously reported post‐vaccination (Brighton collaboration levels 1, 2, and 3) were extracted from the GlaxoSmithKline spontaneous report database on the 11th of January 2013. Expected numbers of IS cases were estimated using the number of vaccine doses distributed and the Japanese incidence rate of IS stratified by month of age. The observed versus expected analysis considered the IS cases for each risk period (7 and 30 days post‐vaccination) and for each vaccine dose (two doses). Results Before January 2013, approximately 601 000 Rotarix TM doses were distributed in Japan. For a risk period of 7 days post‐dose 1 and post‐dose 2, 10 and five IS cases were observed, whereas 3.4 and 7.6 were expected, providing an observed‐to‐expected ratio of 2.96 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.42; 5.45) and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.21; 1.53), respectively. For a risk period of 30 days post‐dose 1 and post‐dose 2, 14 and eight cases were observed, whereas 14.5 and 32.7 were expected, providing an observed‐to‐expected ratio of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.53; 1.62) and 0.24 (95% CI: 0.11; 0.48), respectively. Conclusion A statistically significant excess of IS cases was observed within 7 days post‐dose 1, but not post‐dose 2. These results are consistent with previous observations in large post‐marketing safety studies in other world regions. © 2015 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here