Premium
Glucagon‐like peptide 1‐based therapies and risk of pancreatitis: a self‐controlled case series analysis
Author(s) -
Li Xiaochun,
Zhang Zuoyi,
Duke Jon
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.023
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1099-1557
pISSN - 1053-8569
DOI - 10.1002/pds.3542
Subject(s) - exenatide , sitagliptin , medicine , pancreatitis , confounding , sitagliptin phosphate , acute pancreatitis , pharmacoepidemiology , incidence (geometry) , gastroenterology , diabetes mellitus , type 2 diabetes , pharmacology , endocrinology , medical prescription , physics , optics
Purpose Previous studies have suggested a link between glucagon‐like peptide 1 (GLP‐1)‐based therapies and acute pancreatitis, while other studies have found no association. Because differences in diabetes severity may confound this relationship, a self‐controlled case series (SCCS) analysis has been suggested as a means to control for individual‐level confounding. Methods We evaluated the relationship between GLP‐1‐based therapies and pancreatitis by SCCS method using a large observational database. We calculated the incidence density ratio of pancreatitis for exposure versus non‐exposure to each drug. To examine the robustness of our findings, we performed sensitivity analyses by varying risk windows, using two pancreatitis definitions and including incident pancreatitis or all occurrences. Results From dispensing data on 1.2 million patients, we found 7992 sitagliptin‐exposed patients and 3552 exenatide‐exposed patients between 2004 and 2009. Using an ICD9/CPT‐based case definition of pancreatitis, we identified 207 sitagliptin and 82 exenatide cases. Augmenting this definition with laboratory criteria increased our cohort to 245 sitagliptin and 96 exenatide cases. For sitagliptin and exenatide cases, respectively, the mean duration of observation was 5.2 and 5.5 years, and the mean duration of drug exposure was 0.7 and 0.5 years. For all analyses (including different pancreatitis definitions, risk periods, and incident or recurrent events), the incidence density ratios for development of pancreatitis during exposure versus non‐exposure ranged from 0.68 to 1.46, with all having 95% confidence intervals containing 1. Conclusions We found no association between the use of GLP‐1‐based therapies and pancreatitis using SCCS analysis in a large observational database. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.