Premium
Antipsychotic drugs and risk of pulmonary embolism
Author(s) -
Allenet Benoit,
Schmidlin Sophie,
Genty Céline,
Bosson JeanLuc
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.023
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1099-1557
pISSN - 1053-8569
DOI - 10.1002/pds.2210
Subject(s) - medicine , medical prescription , antipsychotic , pulmonary embolism , confounding , population , retrospective cohort study , clozapine , pharmacoepidemiology , logistic regression , deep vein , emergency medicine , thrombosis , psychiatry , schizophrenia (object oriented programming) , pharmacology , environmental health
ABSTRACT Background Antipsychotic drugs (APs) expose users to several adverse effects. Some reports describe an increased risk of venous thromboembolism for particular drugs in this family. Purpose To examine the association between the risks of pulmonary embolism (PE) and AP use and assess any dose–effect relationships. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of data in ‘Premier's Perspective’ a large US hospital database for 2006. Adults in the AP group had at least one prescription of AP. Logistic regression analysis was performed to detect association between PE and AP use. The dose–effect relationship was assessed according to quantities and administration routes. Analyses were adjusted for potential confounders: age, sex, the components of the Charlson co‐morbidity index, diagnoses of infection, sepsis, inflammatory bowel disease, psychotic disorders and hospital inpatient or outpatient status. Results Among 28 723 771 adults included in 2006, 450 951 (1.6%) were prescribed AP. Haloperidol was most commonly prescribed (157 667 patients or 35.0%), but atypical APs represented over 78% of prescriptions. The risk of PE was higher in AP users than in the total population (OR = 1.17 [95%CI 1.13–1.21]; p < 0.001) and depended on the type of AP used: clozapine was associated with the highest risk. Risk seemed correlated to higher doses. Limitations Non‐hospital prescription data were unavailable, potentially underestimating the number of patients exposed. The relative timing of AP prescription and PE was not available. Results did not include deep vein thrombosis. Conclusion This study suggests an increased risk of PE with AP treatment, varying with type of AP and dependent on dose. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.