z-logo
Premium
Systemic lupus erythematosus prevalence in the U.K.: methodological issues when using the General Practice Research Database to estimate frequency of chronic relapsing‐remitting disease
Author(s) -
Nightingale A. L.,
Farmer R. D. T.,
de Vries C. S.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.023
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1099-1557
pISSN - 1053-8569
DOI - 10.1002/pds.1253
Subject(s) - medicine , incidence (geometry) , pharmacoepidemiology , lupus erythematosus , prevalence , epidemiology , demography , systemic lupus erythematosus , disease , database , pediatrics , immunology , physics , sociology , computer science , medical prescription , antibody , optics , pharmacology
Purpose The purpose of this study was to calculate the prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) between 1992 and 1998 using the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) Methods We identified all individuals who had contributed at least 3 years of data to the GPRD and who had a diagnosis of SLE with supporting evidence of their diagnosis. We calculated the annual age‐ and sex‐specific prevalence of SLE. Additionally, we stratified the prevalence by years of data contributed to the GRPD. Results In males the point estimate of the prevalence of SLE increased from 7.5/100 000 (CI 95 6.3, 8.8) to 10.1/100 000 (CI 95 7.8, 12.2) but this rise was not statistically significant. However, prevalence appeared to increase significantly amongst females from 42.6/100 000 (CI 95 39.6, 45.6) in 1992 to 70.8/100 000 (CI 95 65.1, 76.6) in 1998. This increase was mainly amongst women aged 50–79 and in those contributing more than 5 years of data and could not be explained by increasing incidence of SLE or decreasing mortality during the study period. Conclusions We found an increasing prevalence of SLE that could not be explained by increasing incidence or decreasing mortality. This is almost certainly an artefact caused by the increased likelihood of detecting or confirming cases of chronic relapsing‐remitting diseases with increasing time contributed to the GPRD. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here