Premium
Quality of manufacturer provided information on safety and efficacy claims for dietary supplements for colonic health
Author(s) -
Hass David J.,
Lewis James D.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.023
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1099-1557
pISSN - 1053-8569
DOI - 10.1002/pds.1251
Subject(s) - medicine , food and drug administration , dietary supplement , adverse effect , quality (philosophy) , product (mathematics) , medline , clinical trial , medical emergency , pharmacology , philosophy , chemistry , geometry , food science , mathematics , epistemology , pathology , political science , law
Purpose Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of dietary supplements is not required. However, manufacturers must ensure that data exist to support safety and efficacy claims of their product. This study was designed to evaluate accessibility and quality of such data from manufacturers of dietary supplements for ‘colonic health.’ Methods Supplements promoting ‘colonic health’ were identified at area stores. A physician contacted the manufacturers by mail and telephone requesting data to substantiate claims of efficacy and safety. MEDLINE was searched to identify reports of adverse events or medication interactions. Results Twelve manufacturers of 23 products were surveyed. Eight manufacturers responded, of whom four provided no clinical data to substantiate claims of efficacy or safety. No manufacturer provided data that directly evaluated their product. Our literature review identified a wide range of potential adverse events and drug‐supplement interactions, albeit mostly as case reports, animal studies, or in vitro experiments. Conclusions There is a need to increase availability of supplement safety data to physicians and the general public. Consideration should be given to various responses, including legislative actions that address this issue. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.