Premium
Personal health budgets: a divisive development?
Author(s) -
Greener Mark
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
practical diabetes
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.205
H-Index - 24
eISSN - 2047-2900
pISSN - 2047-2897
DOI - 10.1002/pdi.1909
Subject(s) - medicine , diabetes mellitus , intensive care medicine , endocrinology
Reducing the increasing human, clinical and economic tolls imposed by diabetes taxes the minds of politicians, clinicians and charities. In October 2014, for example, Public Health England reported that, on average, just 36% of people with diabetes met treatment targets for blood pressure, glycaemia and cholesterol. Even England’s best performing area only reached all three targets in 48% of people with diabetes. Moreover, each week approximately 120 people with diabetes have a limb amputated.1 Against this background, personal health budgets (PHBs) aim to improve outcomes ‘by placing patients at the centre of decisions about their care’. PHBs offer, the Department of Health (DH) suggests, ‘greater choice and control’. In particular, PHBs allow patients to work ‘alongside health service professionals to develop and execute a care plan,’ that could include, for example, therapy, personal care and equipment. Fundamentally, PHBs intend to encourage the health and social care system to become more responsive to each patient’s needs.2 ‘We are committed to giving patients with long-term conditions greater choice, flexibility and control over the health and care support they receive. We are working with NHS England and clinicians to extend personal health budgets in a sustainable and clinically effective way,’ a DH spokesperson says. However, Diabetes UK and Wasim Hanif, Professor of Diabetes & Endocrinology at University Hospital Birmingham and a leading expert on diabetes in ethnic minorities, warn that PHBs could be divisive, may not reach those most in need and could even prove counterproductive. Holding your purse strings The government aims that ‘eventually’ commissioners will offer PHBs to everyone in England who could benefit. Since April 2014, people eligible for NHS Continuing Health care could ask for a PHB.3 (NHS Continuing Healthcare refers to care arranged and funded by the NHS for individuals in the community with complex ongoing health care issues, such as needing community nurses, specialist therapists or personal care.4 Some people with diabetes-related complications will be eligible for NHS Continuing Healthcare.) PHBs for NHS Contin uing Healthcare became a right in October 2014. Commissioners can also offer PHBs to people with long-term conditions or mental health problems.3 PHBs allow patients or their representatives to agree health and wellbeing outcomes with one or more health care professionals. Patients know how much money they have to design their care plan, which they can spend ‘in ways and at times that make sense to them’. The NHS can hold the PHB or pay a third party, a patient or their representative.3 Results from pilots run between 2009 and 2012, the DH spokesperson remarks, ‘provided good evidence’ to justify rolling out PHBs, including direct payments for health care. The DH piloted PHBs in several conditions including 174 people with diabetes. On average, the PHB for people with diabetes was £5286, although this ranged from £1–263 970. People with diabetes used their PHB to fund social care (mean £583, range £0–£179 790), well-being (mean £590, range £0–£4103), ‘therapy and other nursing’ services (mean £29, range £0–£5492), and ‘other health’ interventions (mean £1978, range £0–£127 284). However, PHBs did not significantly affect HbA1c, the clinical measure for diabetes used in the pilot, compared to conventional service delivery during one year’s follow up.2 The pilot also found that people need ‘clear, accessible information’ about PHBs and some patients and representatives need advocates. Brokers can also help patients and carers to choose and access support. Brokers, according to NHS England, ‘need to be creative and committed to finding all possible ways to enable people to make their own decisions’. However, pilot sites reported that finding good brokerage services ‘had not been easy’.5 ‘Personal budgets have shown some benefits in social care. For example, a personal budget allows the parents of a disabled child to employ carers who almost become members of the family and who develop a relationship with the child. Without a personal budget they may have to rely on whoever the social services can send around at the time,’ remarks Nikki Joule, Policy Manager at Diabetes UK. ‘PHBs for most people with longterm conditions generally and diabetes in particular are not here yet. But they are clearly coming closer.’ Indeed, the DH and NHS England are assessing methods to ensure that more people have access to PHBs, the spokesperson said. However, the DH notes that there are still outstanding issues around implementing PHBs for large numbers of people and, therefore, ‘any further roll out must be carefully considered’.