Premium
The utilization of prenatal microarray: A survey of current genetic counseling practices and barriers
Author(s) -
Durham Leslie,
Papanna Ramesha,
Stevens Blair,
Noblin Sarah,
RodriguezBuritica David,
Hashmi S. Shahrukh,
Krstic Nevena
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
prenatal diagnosis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.956
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1097-0223
pISSN - 0197-3851
DOI - 10.1002/pd.5435
Subject(s) - genetic counseling , medicine , family medicine , prenatal diagnosis , certification , prenatal screening , medline , genetic testing , clinical practice , medical education , gynecology , pregnancy , fetus , genetics , political science , law , biology
Objective We evaluated what prenatal genetic counselor's (GCs) practices, attitudes, and barriers are in regards to prenatal microarray since the publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the Society for Maternal‐Fetal Medicine (SMFM) guidelines for microarray use. Methods This was a survey‐based cross‐sectional study of English‐speaking, board certified or eligible GCs who currently practice prenatal genetic counseling. Results Of 192 respondents, 183 (95%) have incorporated chromosome microarray (CMA) into clinical practice, with 64% believing that the benefits of CMA outweigh the harms and 52% agreeing that CMA should be offered to all women regardless of indication. Those who reported being experts/comfortable in their knowledge of CMA (85%) and familiar with current clinical guidelines (86%) were significantly more likely to offer CMA to patients undergoing invasive testing and patients with fetal anomalies. Patient‐specific concerns were the largest reported barrier (51%) when GCs do not offer CMA to patients. Conclusion Our study demonstrates GCs follow guidelines for CMA use when specific indications are involved, but further guidelines are needed regarding CMA use for other routine indications where utility of CMA is not clearly understood. On this basis, ACOG and SMFM should continue revising their guidelines as more information comes to light regarding utility of prenatal CMA for all indications, and organizations like the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) should consider publishing guidelines on prenatal CMA that are specialized to the GCs sphere of practice.