Premium
Maternal cfDNA screening for Down syndrome – a cost sensitivity analysis
Author(s) -
Cuckle Howard,
Benn Peter,
Pergament Eugene
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
prenatal diagnosis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.956
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1097-0223
pISSN - 0197-3851
DOI - 10.1002/pd.4157
Subject(s) - medicine , cell free fetal dna , marginal cost , cost effectiveness , statistics , prenatal diagnosis , pregnancy , risk analysis (engineering) , mathematics , fetus , biology , genetics , economics , microeconomics
ABSTRACT Objective This study aimed to determine the principal factors contributing to the cost of avoiding a birth with Down syndrome by using cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) to replace conventional screening. Methods A range of unit costs were assigned to each item in the screening process. Detection rates were estimated by meta‐analysis and modeling. The marginal cost associated with the detection of additional cases using cfDNA was estimated from the difference in average costs divided by the difference in detection. Results The main factor was the unit cost of cfDNA testing. For example, replacing a combined test costing $150 with 3% false‐positive rate and invasive testing at $1000, by cfDNA tests at $2000, $1500, $1000, and $500, the marginal cost is $8.0, $5.8, $3.6, and $1.4m, respectively. Costs were lower when replacing a quadruple test and higher for a 5% false‐positive rate, but the relative importance of cfDNA unit cost was unchanged. A contingent policy whereby 10% to 20% women were selected for cfDNA testing by conventional screening was considerably more cost‐efficient. Costs were sensitive to cfDNA uptake. Conclusion Universal cfDNA screening for Down syndrome will only become affordable by public health purchasers if costs fall substantially. Until this happens, the contingent use of cfDNA is recommended. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.