Premium
Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in a diagnostic laboratory; experience with >1000 cases and review of the literature
Author(s) -
Breman Amy,
Pursley Amber N.,
Hixson Patricia,
Bi Weimin,
Ward Patricia,
Bacino Carlos A.,
Shaw Chad,
Lupski James R.,
Beaudet Arthur,
Patel Ankita,
Cheung Sau W.,
Van den Veyver Ignatia
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
prenatal diagnosis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.956
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1097-0223
pISSN - 0197-3851
DOI - 10.1002/pd.3861
Subject(s) - amniocentesis , chorionic villus sampling , karyotype , prenatal diagnosis , copy number variation , fluorescence in situ hybridization , comparative genomic hybridization , chromosome abnormality , medicine , advanced maternal age , chromosome , chorionic villi , products of conception , microarray , obstetrics , abnormality , cytogenetics , chromosomal abnormality , fetus , biology , pregnancy , genetics , gestation , genome , gene , gene expression , psychiatry
Objective To evaluate the results of prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) on >1000 fetal samples referred for testing at our institution and to compare these data to published reports. Methods High resolution CMA was offered to women undergoing amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling. Parental samples were obtained concurrently to exclude maternal cell contamination and assist interpretation of copy number variations. Results Clinically significant copy number variations were observed in 85/1115 cases (7.6%) overall, and in 45/1075 cases (4.2 %) if 40 abnormal cases with known chromosome abnormalities or familial genomic imbalances were excluded. Eighteen of the 1115 cases had variants of unclear clinical significance (1.6%). Indications yielding the most clinically significant findings were abnormal karyotype/fluorescence in situ hybridization (26/61, 42.6%), family history of chromosomal abnormality (13/137, 9.5%), abnormal ultrasound (38/410, 9.3%), abnormal serum screening (2/37, 5.4%) and advanced maternal age (5/394, 1.3%). Of 1075 cases having no previously known cytogenetic abnormality or family history, 18 (1.7%) had clinically significant genomic changes undetectable by conventional prenatal chromosome analysis. Conclusion Current experience confirms that the detection rate of CMA for prenatal chromosomal abnormalities surpasses that of conventional karyotype analysis and continues to improve with higher resolution arrays, while maintaining a low frequency of results of unclear clinical significance. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.