Premium
Direct access midwifery booking for prenatal care and its role in Down syndrome screening
Author(s) -
Nawaz Tariq S.,
Tringham Gillian M.,
Holding Stephen,
McFarlane Jane,
Lindow Stephen W.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
prenatal diagnosis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.956
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1097-0223
pISSN - 0197-3851
DOI - 10.1002/pd.2820
Subject(s) - referral , prenatal screening , medicine , prenatal care , first trimester , obstetrics , primary care , prenatal diagnosis , down syndrome , pregnancy , family medicine , pediatrics , fetus , population , psychiatry , environmental health , biology , genetics
Objective To compare the uptake of Down syndrome screening by women following referral by direct access and general practitioner (GP) modes. Methods The method of referral by either GP or direct access, for women who booked into prenatal care in Hull and East Yorkshire in 2010, was analysed using data collected from the Protos database at the Women and Children's Hospital, Hull. Subsequently, the uptake of first and second trimester screening for Down syndrome was reviewed by combining the Protos database to the screening data collected by the Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory at Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull. Results Women booked into prenatal care significantly earlier when referred by GP in comparison to direct access with a significant difference in screening uptake of 49.5 and 42.7%, respectively. The ratio of uptake between first and second trimester screening was not significantly different. Conclusions Further research on the new direct access method of referral is required, as it may have a role in the uptake of prenatal screening for Down syndrome. More time is needed to show a definitive effect. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.