Premium
Outcome of cases of de novo structural rearrangements diagnosed at amniocentesis
Author(s) -
Warburton Dorothy
Publication year - 1984
Publication title -
prenatal diagnosis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.956
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1097-0223
pISSN - 0197-3851
DOI - 10.1002/pd.1970040706
Subject(s) - amniocentesis , abnormality , supernumerary , medicine , chromosomal abnormality , prenatal diagnosis , obstetrics , pregnancy , karyotype , fetus , biology , genetics , chromosome , anatomy , psychiatry , gene
The frequency of de novo rearrangements at amniocentesis was determined in 76952 prenatal diagnoses from centres in the United States. Rates for balanced rearrangements are slightly greater than rates previously reported in the newborn, possibly because banding studies were not used in the latter. Rates for unbalanced rearrangements are considerably higher in the amniocentesis data not only because banding was used but also because a substantial loss of abnormal conceptions is to be expected between amniocentesis and birth. The higher frequency of cases with supernumerary markers at amniocentesis is unexplained. A review of 66 apparently balanced de novo rearrangements found at amniocentesis revealed evidence of abnormality in five; in four of these the abnormality was noted in the abortus. The number of cases observed is still too small to rule out a risk of abnormality no greater than the usual rate of abnormalities at birth. Abnormalities were detected in 6 of 10 cases with unbalanced de novo rearrangements. In 33 cases of non‐familial supernumerary chromosomes 6 (18.2 per cent) showed abnormality. Non‐satellited markers appeared to have a higher rate of abnormality than satellited markers but the difference is not statistically significant. Further studies and improved follow‐up of de NOVO cases diagnosed at amniocentesis are required.