Premium
Optimized criteria for using fluorescence in situ hybridization in the prenatal diagnosis of common aneuploidies
Author(s) -
Leclercq Sandrine,
Lebbar Aziza,
Grange Gilles,
Tsatsaris Vassilis,
Le Tessier Dominique,
Dupont JeanMichel
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
prenatal diagnosis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.956
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1097-0223
pISSN - 0197-3851
DOI - 10.1002/pd.1959
Subject(s) - prenatal diagnosis , fluorescence in situ hybridization , aneuploidy , cytogenetics , medicine , obstetrics , biology , pregnancy , genetics , fetus , chromosome , gene
Objective To evaluate the medical and economic performance of three strategies for selecting patients eligible for interphase FISH in the prenatal diagnosis of common aneuploidies. Methods We evaluated three protocols on the same population that was referred for prenatal diagnosis between June 2001 and December 2006. The number of aneuploidies detected by FISH and the relative cost (reagent and technical staff cost) are reported for each strategy. Results 2707 women were referred for prenatal diagnosis either because of advanced maternal age over 38 (48%), abnormal maternal serum screening (35%) or prenatal ultrasound anomalies (17%). A total of 4.8% chromosomal anomalies (balanced and unbalanced) were diagnosed after karyotyping. Theoretically, interphase FISH should have detected 79.4% of the unbalanced anomalies. We observed a significant improvement in the trisomy 21 detection by selecting the probes according to the reason for referral. The last protocol adopted, which offers a rapid test to 57% of women undergoing amniocentesis, presents the best aneuploidy detection rate (68% of total aneuploidies, 87% of trisomy 21). Conclusion Selecting probes according to medical criteria patients combined with a technical procedure modification allows medico‐economic improvement of interphase FISH in routine diagnosis. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.