Premium
Critical evaluation of elective termination of pregnancy in a tertiary fetal medicine center during 43 months: correlation of prenatal diagnosis findings and postmortem examination
Author(s) -
Ramalho Carla,
Matias Alexandra,
Brandão Otília,
Montenegro Nuno
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
prenatal diagnosis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.956
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1097-0223
pISSN - 0197-3851
DOI - 10.1002/pd.1567
Subject(s) - medicine , concordance , prenatal diagnosis , pregnancy , fetus , autopsy , obstetrics , retrospective cohort study , referral , pediatrics , surgery , pathology , family medicine , biology , genetics
Abstract Objectives The aim of this study is the critical evaluation of cases of elective termination of pregnancy (TOP) in the Prenatal Diagnosis Center of S. João Hospital. Material and Methods We performed a retrospective study of cases of elective TOP over a 43‐month period in a tertiary referral hospital. The fetal indications for termination were analyzed. A comparative study of the prenatal diagnosis, established by ultrasound, and the results of postmortem findings, was performed. These were classified as having complete agreement, complete disagreement and major agreement with additional information. Results In total, during this period, 76 elective terminations of pregnancy were performed due to fetal causes. The number of fetal identified grounds was 25 cases of chromosomal abnormalities, 36 cases of morphological anomalies and 15 cases of other fetal situations. The comparison between ultrasound and fetopathologic findings showed complete agreement of diagnosis in 61.1% of cases, and no case of absolute discordance was identified. Major concordance with additional information was found in 38.9% of cases, with an increased risk of recurrence in six cases, and a decreased estimated risk of recurrence in three cases. Discussion This study reinforces the importance of the systematic evaluation of all cases of elective TOP by autopsy performed by a specialist fetal pathologist. This is the most reliable way of assessing the adequacy of prenatal diagnosis and implementing quality control. More than corroborating or correcting the prenatal diagnosis, systematic autopsy may establish a definite diagnosis, adjust prognosis and may be helpful in counseling the parents for a future pregnancy. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.