Premium
Three‐ versus two‐dimensional ultrasound for nuchal translucency thickness measurements: comparison of feasibility and levels of agreement
Author(s) -
Eppel Wolfgang,
Worda Christof,
Frigo Peter,
Lee Andreas
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
prenatal diagnosis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.956
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1097-0223
pISSN - 0197-3851
DOI - 10.1002/pd.116
Subject(s) - ultrasound , medicine , transvaginal ultrasound , 3d ultrasound , nuchal translucency , gestational age , limits of agreement , nuchal translucency measurement , crown rump length , nuclear medicine , fetus , gynecology , radiology , pregnancy , first trimester , genetics , biology
We have determined feasibility and levels of agreement for visualizing the nuchal translucency within a time limit with three‐dimensional (3D) and two‐dimensional (2D) transvaginal ultrasound. A total of 213 women of median gestational age 13 weeks (range 11–14 weeks) undergoing first‐trimester nuchal translucency (NT) thickness measurements with 2D transabdominal ultrasound were included in the study. Additionally all women underwent 2D and 3D transvaginal NT examination within a time limit of 90 s. These two methods were compared with each other and with our standard method (2D transabdominal ultrasound) with respect to visualization of fetal nuchal fold and to the levels of agreement. The nuchal fold was visualized by 3D and 2D transvaginal ultrasound in 85.9% (95% CI: 80.5%, 90.3%) and 25.8% (95% CI: 20.1%, 32.2%), respectively ( p <0.001). There was a statistically significant underestimation of the NT by 2D transabdominal as compared with 3D transvaginal ultrasound of 0.1 mm ( p <0.001), and by 3D transvaginal as compared with 2D transvaginal ultrasound of even 0.1 mm ( p <0.001). 3D transvaginal ultrasound of the nuchal fold has increased feasibility to 2D transvaginal ultrasound within a short examination time and with minimal, but significant, measurement differences. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.