z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Crystallization of double crystalline diblock copolymer from microphase separated melt
Author(s) -
Kundu Chitrita,
Joshi Nikhil S.,
Dasmahapatra Ashok K.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
polymer crystallization
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.443
H-Index - 9
ISSN - 2573-7619
DOI - 10.1002/pcr2.10089
Subject(s) - crystallization , materials science , crystallinity , lamellar structure , annealing (glass) , copolymer , chemical engineering , isothermal process , crystallography , composite material , thermodynamics , polymer , chemistry , engineering , physics
Diblock copolymers by virtue of the chemical dissimilarity between the constituting blocks exhibit microphase separation in the melt state. The phase separated melt can successfully be exploited to control the morphology of the final semi crystalline materials by allowing an extended thermal annealing, which accelerates coalescence of microdomains. Herein, we report simulation results on the crystallization behavior of A‐B diblock copolymer, wherein the melting temperature of A‐block is higher than B‐block, instigated from microphase separated melt. During crystallization, the morphological evolution of microphase separated melt is extensively driven by thermal history. Isothermal crystallization confines crystallization in phase separated microdomains, whereas nonisothermal crystallization results in morphological perturbation of melt microdomains. Annealing of microphase separated melt successfully reorients melt morphology, where isothermal as well as nonisothermal crystallization retains the melt morphology intact due to the hard confinement resulted during microphase separation. The rate of crystallization of microphase separated annealed melt is much faster than microphase separated melt without annealing due to more relaxed structure of microphase separated melt achieved through the process of annealing. Two‐step compared to one‐step isothermal crystallization yields higher crystallinity of A‐block with thicker crystals whereas crystallinity and lamellar thickness of B‐block remains same for both the processes.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here